Good or Appropriate Number Plates

For any general chat and banter.

Moderators: scimjim, philhoward, Lukeyboy46, erikscimitardemon, Roger Pennington

User avatar
philhoward
RSSOC Member
Posts: 24904
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:41 pm
Location: Staffs, UK
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 599 times
Contact:

Good or Appropriate Number Plates

Post by philhoward » Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:28 pm

swoakes wrote:
Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:03 pm
No photo but 1 WO on Bentley yesterday coming home from Manchester Airport
I see that one quite regularly but I do spend a bit of time at the factory..


Phil Howard
Scimitarweb Forum Admin
SS1 1600 Rooster Turbo; Sabre Mk1.5, Sabre Mk2
Previous: SE5/5a/SS1 No.1/SS1 Rooster/SS1 1800Ti/SE5a 24 Valve
http://www.ss1turbo.com
Never try and argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you based on experience.

User avatar
Coupe Racing
RSSOC Member
Posts: 7300
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:51 pm
Location: Nr Telford - Shropshire
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Good or Appropriate Number Plates

Post by Coupe Racing » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:58 pm

M6 today a white Tesler TE55LER

Should have been TO 55 ER by the lane discipline


Blessed are the Cheese makers

Better to be an hour early than 1 minute late

gtcse8
RSSOC Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:11 am
Location: Steeton, Yorkshire Dales
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Good or Appropriate Number Plates

Post by gtcse8 » Tue Jul 16, 2019 6:23 pm

Coupe Racing wrote:
Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:58 pm
should have been TO 55 ER by the lane discipline
:lol:


Mark Wilson. See the Beast on youtube under" RELIANT SCIMITAR CONVERSION LOL.,Se5,Se5a, Se6a, Two Se6b`s,1 & 1/2 GTC`s, SST 1800Ti & not a lot of sense

roymck
RSSOC Member
Posts: 1095
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:33 am
Location: Dorking Surrey
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Good or Appropriate Number Plates

Post by roymck » Tue Jul 16, 2019 6:37 pm

78DBDC0C-0303-4033-B331-1F8C41B3C775.jpeg
78DBDC0C-0303-4033-B331-1F8C41B3C775.jpeg (164.13 KiB) Viewed 50 times



Post Reply

Return to “Non-Technical Discussion”